Kentucky v king, 563 us 452 (2011), was a decision by the united states supreme court which held that warrantless searches conducted in police-created exigent circumstances do not violate the fourth amendment so long as the police did not create the exigency by violating or threatening to violate the fourth amendment. Kentucky vs king facts: an undercover police officer watched a controlled deal from inside his unmarked police car when the deal was over, the undercover police officer radioed for uniformed police officers to move in on the suspect, who was heading towards a breezeway in an apartment complex.
Justice alito has the opinion of the court this morning in case 09-1272, kentucky versus king he has asked that i announce it for him this case comes to us on the writ of certiorari to the supreme court of kentucky. Case opinion for us supreme court kentucky v king read the court's full decision on findlaw including the kentucky supreme court, ask whether law enforcement officers 'deliberately created the exigent circumstances with the bad faith intent to avoid the warrant requirement' 302 s w 3d, brief for respondent 24 in respondent's.
United states supreme court kentucky vking, (2011) no 09-1272 argued: january 12, 2011 decided: may 16, 2011 police officers in lexington, kentucky, followed a suspected drug dealer to an apartment complex. Kentucky v king case brief summary 131 sct 1849 (2011) case synopsis the supreme court of kentucky reversed respondent's drug conviction, holding that exigent circumstances could not justify the officers' search under the fourth amendment because it was reasonably foreseeable that the occupants in the apartment would destroy evidence when the police knocked on the door and announced their. Police officers in lexington, ky, entered an apartment building in pursuit of a suspect who sold crack cocaine to an undercover informant the officers.
Kentucky v king supreme court of the united states kentucky v king including the kentucky supreme court, ask whether law enforcement officers “ ‘deliberately created the exigent circumstances with the bad faith intent to avoid the warrant requirement’ ” 302 s w 3d, brief for respondent 24 in respondent’s view, relevant. A summary and case brief of kentucky v king, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents kentucky v.
Comments off on kentucky v king: the one where the supreme court dishonors the warrant requirement in drug cases in the post-king world of criminal procedure, law enforcement agents will be able to regularly disregard the fourth amendment in drug cases the kentucky supreme court overturned king’s conviction, holding that “the.