I suspect that most americans want schools to teach patriotism however, experts on education are, for the most part, leery of this goal in a circle working paper (pdf), william damon writes: the final, and most serious, problem that i will mention has to do with the capacity for positive feelings. Should we teach patriotic history and teach patriotism in our schools politicians, professors of higher education, parents, students, and citizens should all have a vested interest in these two issues. Should we promote patriotism in schools educational theory and philosophy about whether or not the teaching of patriotism has any place argues that patriotism to be taught non.
What i'm arguing is that patriotism is taught in a way to where students can see it for what it is and choose whether or not to embrace it what i'm arguing is that it be restricted to a knowledge basis in the schools (or, if not on a knowledge/exemplary level, allow such teaching be optional). Of patriotism and the iconography of the american flag in today’s society some believe patriotism is simply the act of supporting the decisions of the leaders of the country others say, to be patriotic, people should be outspoken and voice their oppositions to what is going on in the government.
American history should be taught in public schools if history is taught as it is documented, and not with a liberal political agenda (the way is being taught today) then patriotism will ensue patriotism is a value that is cultivated by an individual who has developed a sense of pride for their country. If patriotism is love of one's country, the attempt to promote it in schools must count as a form of emotional education emotional education is defensible in so far as it consists in offering.
Today, education guardian publishes the early results of the first study on teachers' and pupils' views about whether patriotism should be encouraged, discouraged or passively tolerated in british schools the findings show most teachers are confused about what line, if any, the government expects them to take.
However, con goes on to argue that patriotism should be encouraged by not taught, because teaching patriotism, on the other hand, can only lead to divisiveness con's argument fails because it is not possible to separate teaching from encouraging, and because a democracy should not place suppressing divisiveness above determining and supporting what is good.
In martha nussbaum’s “patriotism and cosmopolitanism” she argues whether children should be taught in education to be patriotic or cosmopolitan nussbaum’s definition of cosmopolitanism is a person whose primary allegiance is to the community of human beings in the entire world.
For this reason patriotism and nationalism should be distinguished, and the initial question should be understood to be about whether education for patriotism—and not for nationalism—is morally required, permitted or unacceptable.
Nothing is pure in what is being taught in our civic education classes there are many external forces that will shape our history lessons 1996, p 206) the argument goes back to the principle, if we don’t always know the truth, what does it matter we will write a custom essay sample on should we teach patriotism in schools specifically.